- Proposals produced independently
- Evidence comparison + preserved dissent
- Independent verification → decision or uncertainty
Independent scouting
Generate initial answers without showing other proposals. Include assumptions, supporting evidence and unknowns.
Share evidence
Compare proposals against the same criteria. Count copied support from a common source once; do not score popularity.
Preserve dissent
Request a verifiable objection to each option. Record whether it is resolved; do not suppress an agent for disagreeing.
Verify the decision
Run an independent check after bounded rounds. If contradictions persist, return an unresolved decision rather than forcing consensus.
Role responsibilities
- Scout
- Produce an independent proposal, sources and weaknesses.
- Challenger
- Test conditions under which the strongest proposal would fail.
- Verifier
- Check the decision against predefined criteria.
Shared memory contract
proposal_idindependent_originevidence_idscriterion_scoresobjectionsverifier_result- Stop condition
- Decide if acceptance criteria pass; otherwise produce a reasoned uncertainty report at the round/budget limit.
- Primary failure mode
- Agents may repeat the same model's mistake. More votes do not replace independent sources or an external verifier.
Interactive laboratory · abstract model
BEE · From scouting to resource choice
In the Honey Bee Collective Intelligence Laboratory, explore how scout ratio, dance recruitment and communication noise affect allocation between food sources. Observe the relationship between independent discovery and social information.
BEE’s current experiment models foraging and dance recruitment. Nest-site selection, stop signals and quorum mechanisms in the SWI dossier are a separate research context. Model measurements are neither field data nor evidence of agent-recipe performance.
Open BEE laboratory (new tab)